The Cumberland Throw

Stat Attack Review – Round 5: Eels vs Raiders

Eels 18 defeated by Raiders 30

Crowd: 17,653

For the third week in a row we have another disappointing performance from the Eels.

Without doubt Parramatta have been the masters of their own destiny. Rounds 1 and 2 seem so far away now as the Eels stumbled and fumbled to another loss. Thank heavens for the Tigers issues at the moment as no doubt the rugby league media would be feasting on our performances over the past 3 weeks. However, there’s been no escaping some social media sites, where it seems certain that the sky is falling.

Lets look at the stats that matter to Parramatta.

 

Score Flow:

Parramatta Eels
H Minute Name Event Score
1 6 I.Soliola TRY 4 – 0
1 8 J.Croker CONVERSION 6 – 0
1 24 B.French TRY 6 – 4
1 25 C.Gutherson CONVERSION 6 – 6
1 28 B.Austin TRY 10 – 6
1 29 J.Croker CONVERSION 12 – 6
1 30 J.Leilua TRY 16 – 6
1 32 J.Croker CONVERSION MISS 16 – 6
1 35 J.Croker TRY 20 – 6
1 37 J.Croker CONVERSION 22 – 6
2 47 M.Jennings TRY 22 – 10
2 48 C.Gutherson CONVERSION 22 – 12
2 52 K.Pritchard TRY 22 – 16
2 53 C.Gutherson CONVERSION 22 – 18
2 69 N.Cotric TRY 26 – 18
2 70 J.Croker CONVERSION 28 – 18
2 76 J.Croker PENALTY GOAL 30 – 18

 

Full Time:

 CAN Team Stats  PAR
55 Possession (%)

45

26/35 (74)

Complete/Total Sets (%) 22/29 (76)
41:55 Time – Opposition Half

38:24

16:02

Time – Opposition 20 16:09
2194 Metres Gained

2032

7

Scrum Win 5
0 Goal Line Dropout

1

4

Penalty Conceded 6
0 Forty Twenty

1

 

Apart from the overall possession rate, the rest of the full time stats make the match appear pretty even. A slightly better completion rate from the Eels this week did see them get back into the game in the start to middle part of the second half. Both teams certainly had ample opportunities in each other’s 20.

 

1st Half:

 CAN Team Stats  PAR
60 Possession (%)

40

13/18 (72)

Complete/Total Sets (%) 7/12 (58)
28:01 Time – Opposition Half

12:07

9:18

Time – Opposition 20 6:49
1222 Metres Gained

853

4

Scrum Win 3
0 Goal Line Dropout

1

1

Penalty Conceded 3
0 Forty Twenty

0

 

The 1st half Scoreboard domination by Canberra was completely reflected in the stats. That first half completion rate was a continuation of the horror stories from the previous weeks. It is impossible to win football matches if you can’t control possession. You don’t get territory, and you have no chance of mounting any pressure on the defence. The Eels just looked uninterested and tired in the first stanza as the Raiders ran in 3 late tries to end the half and subsequently end the game. That completion rate in the first half pretty much handed the game to the Raiders.

 

2nd Half:

 CAN Team Stats  PAR
50 Possession (%)

50

13/17 (76)

Complete/Total Sets (%) 15/17 (88)
13:54 Time – Opposition Half

26:17

6:44

Time – Opposition 20 9:20
972 Metres Gained

1179

3

Scrum Win 2
0 Goal Line Dropout

0

3

Penalty Conceded 3

0

Forty Twenty

1

 

Wow, where was this side in the 1st half? What a difference a change in attitude coupled with a better completion rate can make. Parramatta came out the sheds fired up and looked to be on their way to a miraculous comeback. With this great completion rate, more time in the opposition half and a better go forward the Eels placed themselves back in the contest and it was reflected in the scoreboard when they drew to within 4 points. Again, being able to focus for an entire half was a major factor in derailing the Eels comeback, especially with the late Cotric try as he went through a very tired and non-moving Eels defensive line. Is it fatigue, attitude, mental focus or a combination of all three? This is something that the coaching staff will need to address.

 

Attack:

 

Top 5 Runs
Name R
 CAN J.Wighton 20
 CAN J.Papalii 19
 CAN J.Rapana 16
 PAR S.Radradra 16
 PAR N.Brown 15
Top 5 Run Metres
Name RM
 CAN J.Wighton 197
 CAN J.Papalii 192
 CAN J.Rapana 168
 PAR N.Brown 149
 CAN N.Cotric 148

 

Did the Eels attack fail to fire or did the Raiders attack simply have an easier time against our defence? Staitistically, the Eels were whole heartedly beaten by a Raiders side full of running. The Raiders back 3 all ran over 100 metres, with another 5 team mates surpassing that benchmark. In comparison, a total of 5 Eels players notched up over 100 running metres.

 

Nathan Brown 149m
Semi Radradra 132m
Manu Ma’u 121m
Frank Pritchard 117m
Michael Jennings 103m

 

The Eels forwards were well contained by the bigger and more mobile Raiders pack. Our start to the year was based on our aggressive forward play, but that just went missing in this game. A lot of questions have been asked of our forwards and this week they just couldn’t go with their Raiders opponents.

 

Defence:

Top 5 Tackles
Name TAK
 PAR K.Pritchard 49
 PAR N.Brown 36
 PAR M.Ma’u 36
 CAN I.Soliola 34
 CAN J.Hodgson 33
Top 5 Missed Tackles
Name MT
 PAR S.Matagi 6
 PAR C.Norman 6
 PAR K.Pritchard 5
 CAN I.Soliola 3
 CAN S.Boyd 3

 

Our 1st half performance really put pressure on our defence as we gave the Raiders extra sets for them to attack us with.  Although the 2nd half was a much improved performance, that extra defensive work in the 1st half took its toll later in the 2nd half as fatigue set in and cruelled our attack.

Overall we made 61 extra tackles then the Raiders (with 8 Eels having to make more than 20 tackles). That’s an extra 10 sets to defend. That would fatigue most teams in the competition.

Eels Tackles: 346

Raiders Tackles: 285

So in the end what can be said that hasn’t already been said? You go back, have a look at the tape, learn and move on to next week. There were glimpses of what the Eels can do, so at least there was some positives to come out of this game. We did win the second half.

Does BA need to have a look and tinker with the side? Does Peni come back? Do we need a second hooker on the bench? Are our forwards looking tired? Is Mannah’s game time indicative that his starting spot is in jeopardy? Do Gutherson and Norman complement each other in the halves?

Lots of questions to be asked.

Another tough road trip awaits the Eels in Round 6 as we head across the ditch to Mt Smart Stadium to face off against the Warriors.

 

STAT ATTACK: Player of the Week

 

Nathan Brown

As I look back at Browny’s stats so far, he has been doing a lot of work both in defence and attack.

I guess he stood out more at Souths as they don’t really have an attacking forward pack and Nathan stood out there. But at the Eels where there is more ball playing forwards, Nathan has been the quiet achiever in the Eels forward stocks.

With his late inclusion to the starting side on Saturday, he took that opportunity with both hands and made every post a winner. He definitely gave BA food for thought regarding a starting position.

Great work Browny. Keep it up mate.

Possessions 23
Runs (metres) 15 (149m)
Offloads 2
Tackle Breaks 2
Tackles 36
Missed Tackles 2
Minutes Played 68

Colmac

Champion Data

Stats courtesy of Champion Data. All these stats and more can be viewed on our match centre at http://mc.championdata.com/nrl/ including live game stats.

– Colmac

Champion Data

Follow @championdatanrl

mc.championdata.com/nrl

If you liked this article, you might consider supporting The Cumberland Throw.

4 thoughts on “Stat Attack Review – Round 5: Eels vs Raiders

  1. Colin Hussey

    Thanks for those Stats again Colmac (hope I’ve got it right this week)

    Its interesting with Brown and your words quiet achiever is apt as I didn’t think he had the best of games at least in front of the box that is. And I have to think that he needs to be in the run on side each week, maybe at 13 and when Tim comes off Scott comes on as a change to ensure a captain is on the field all the time.

    What is also shown up is that while Kasya has been labelled as having the most missed tackles these show differently and while the number and one crucial tackle was missed by Kaysa there are others as bad or worse and one, Matagi played much less minutes.

    Ps, I hope it was ok as I pasted a couple of the stats on 1eeyed to hopefully make some sense there.

  2. Pou

    Yeah Brown has been our best player this year. As for the Raiders game, we again gave away too much ball. This left to fatigue which led to defensive lapses which led to an unassailable lead. The halftime break came at just the right time (ten minutes earlier would have been nice) but 16 points was a lot to claw back. I think the stats showed we can be competitive if we just get smarter with our use of the footy.

  3. Mitchy

    Nice work Colmac; our stats were not that bad compared to Canberra. We had them on toast and just needed to show application for the entire 2nd half; there were 2 calls that I believe went against us but their last try was v poor by us.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *