The Cumberland Throw

Stats That Matta – Round 6, 2019: Eels Defeat Tigers

 

EELS 51

(Tries: M. Jennings x 2, M. Moses, B. Takairangi, J. Salmon, O. Kaufusi, R. Mahoney, M. Sivo, S. Lane. Goals: M. Moses 7 from 9. Field Goal: M. Moses 1 from 1.)

Defeated

TIGERS 6

(Tries: B. Matulino. Goals: E. Marsters 1 from 1.)

Monday, April 22 2019

BankWest Stadium

Crowd: 29,047

Rugby league can be a funny game.

Last week I had nothing to say about our performance, and again it’s the same this week – albeit for reasons at the opposite end of the spectrum.

No one saw this coming. With the build up and all the emotion of the coming home, and the Tigers claim to Home stadium status everyone was expecting a tight affair between the two teams..

The opening ten minutes certainly seemed to confirm such predictions. With injuries reeking havoc on both sides, all signs pointed to this being a war of attrition. Would there be any fresh bodies left on the bench?

Then Gutho and Moses combined for that spectacular first try and the flood gates opened – and the rest is history in this very historic game.

Since Monday, the highlights of the game itself have been covered ad infinitum, so I’ll simply let the numbers do the talking.

Parramatta Eels
H Minute Name Event Score
1 13 M.Moses TRY 4 – 0
1 15 M.Moses CONVERSION 6 – 0
1 17 B.Takairangi TRY 10 – 0
1 19 M.Moses CONVERSION 12 – 0
1 22 M.Jennings TRY 16 – 0
1 23 M.Moses CONVERSION 18 – 0
1 25 M.Jennings TRY 22 – 0
1 27 M.Moses CONVERSION 24 – 0
1 29 J.Salmon TRY 28 – 0
1 30 M.Moses CONVERSION 30 – 0
1 35 B.Matulino TRY 30 – 4
1 35 E.Marsters CONVERSION 30 – 6
2 47 O.Kaufusi TRY 34 – 6
2 49 M.Moses CONVERSION 36 – 6
2 50 R.Mahoney TRY 40 – 6
2 51 M.Moses CONVERSION 42 – 6
2 60 M.Sivo TRY 46 – 6
2 62 M.Moses CONVERSION MISS 46 – 6
2 65 S.Lane TRY 50 – 6
2 67 M.Moses CONVERSION MISS 50 – 6
2 79 M.Moses FIELD GOAL 51 – 6

Game Stats

Team Stats

Full Time

58 Possession (%) 42
31/44 (70) Complete/Total Sets (%) 21/25 (84)
48:41 Time – Opposition Half 31:27
23:10 Time – Opposition 20 10:36
2579 Metres Gained 1767
3 Scrum Win 10
0 Goal Line Dropout 1
2 Penalty Conceded 6
0 Forty Twenty 0
Team Stats

First Half

53 Possession (%) 47
14/22 (64) Complete/Total Sets (%) 12/13 (92)
28:44 Time – Opposition Half 11:23
12:02 Time – Opposition 20 6:10
1333 Metres Gained 910
0 Scrum Win 7
0 Goal Line Dropout 1
1 Penalty Conceded 2
0 Forty Twenty 0
Team Stats

Second Half

63 Possession (%) 37
17/22 (77) Complete/Total Sets (%) 9/12 (75)
19:57 Time – Opposition Half 20:04
11:08 Time – Opposition 20 4:26
1246 Metres Gained 857
3 Scrum Win 3
0 Goal Line Dropout 0
1 Penalty Conceded 4
0 Forty Twenty 0

What domination!

We could be harsh and criticise the completion rates, especially from the first half. But the most important spaspect of possession is what you do with it. So how can we be critical of nine tries?

Now let’s talk discipline. The total of two penalties was reflective of the Eels control of the game and this would put a smile on the face of BA and his staff. Indeed, the discipline this year is to be commended.

Big scores are great, but playing the game at our pace, and controlling what we can as a team is crucial. The low penalty count and impressive defence is reflective of that.

It was a sensational effort all over the park.

Player Stats

 

 

Forward Rotation

Games Avg Mins Last Week This Week
Daniel Alvaro 6 37 48 1
Reed Mahoney 6 71 70 80
Junior Paulo 5 59 60 67
Shaun Lane 6 77 80 72
Marata Niukore 6 75 80 50
Tepai Moeroa 5 43 35 46
Peni Terepo 4 46 55 42
Tim Mannah 6 35 28 46
Oregon Kaufusi 3 24 24 41
Ray Stone 1 37 37

Increased minutes from Junior, Tepai, Timmy and Oregon were obviously the result of the head injuries to Danny and Marata. Mahoney was back up to 80 minutes – what a way to celebrate his 21st birthday. We were also treated to nearly 40 minutes of Ray Stone. For those who’d only ever seen his brief appearance at dummy half last year, this week provided a better reflection of what this tough as nails forward brings to the table.

 

Totals

Runs 174 133
Run Metres 1975 1290
Tackles 262 362
Missed Tackles 21 26
Tackle Ineffective 16 10
Effective Tackle Rate 88% 91%
Errors 13 8

Heat Maps

Set Starts

I guess there was no variation in the way the Tigers were kicking off. 😊

Hit Ups

Our runners were just powering through the Tigers defence like a hot knife through butter. The forwards bullied their opponents and were completely dominant in getting metres in the middle, setting up our halves and edges to run riot. It was just beautiful rugby league to watch.

Summary

Put simply, there hasn’t been a dominant display like that in the NRL in a while. It’s certainly been a long time since an Eels side has demolished an opposition like that.

Everyone played a role, especially when injuries struck. Luckily we scored heaps of tries to get a good breather.

We now come up against another bogey side in the Newcastle Knights.

It doesn’t matter how the Knights are playing, they always seem to have the wood over the Eels whether it is in the Hunter or in Sydney.

The number one thing Brad Arthur must install in the boys after a massive win is to keep them grounded and focussed on the next game. It is crucial that we don’t take the Knights lightly – history reminds us that it would be foolish to do so.

We have the team to produce a much better season. We simply require these disciplined efforts week in, week out.

Yours in Blue and Gold

Colmac

https://i0.wp.com/thecumberlandthrow.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Champion-Data.png?resize=194%2C79

Stats courtesy of Champion Data.

All these stats and more can be viewed on our match centre at http://mc.championdata.com/nrl/ including live game stats.

 

 

If you liked this article, you might consider supporting The Cumberland Throw.

14 thoughts on “Stats That Matta – Round 6, 2019: Eels Defeat Tigers

  1. Milo

    Thanks Colmac, great read once again and thank you.
    For me your last two paragraphs are paramount; Parra need to keep the confidence level, but maintain the discipline and attitude on and off the ball. We do this for 80 and we are hard to beat.
    We wont get the ref calls and the team has to start again which I’m sure BA will remind them of this. I also hope we can lay the platform in the forwards and come away with a bogey team off our back. Tough one and a game we should win but do not always come away with.

    1. John Eel

      Milo I think the biggest single difference in 2019, apart from the playing confidence, is that our forwards are owning the middle. Add to that the quick play the balls and the Tigers were gassed.

      After that as Shelley’s dad said “the Tigers were lost in the jungle “

  2. Colin Hussey

    There’s a lot in those stats that are really pleasing, shows the team as a whole is really responding to plans this year.

    The mini numbers in penalties conceded, tackle counts, metres gained, and pretty well every other area are huge.

    A report next Sunday will be the icing on the cake. need some cream for the filling though.

      1. !0 Year Member

        Agreed Sixties, and playing for the whole 80 min. Against the Raiders, we had no control, but we hung in there for the whole 80 min, which was very impressive.

  3. DDay

    The Hit up heat map showing the forwards going through the middle is in complete contrast to the horse shoe shape against Canberra. Surprised Tigers were so good with their handling and tackle rate – I guess highlights how good the Eels execution was.

    1. Sixties

      Good pick up DDay. That horseshoe shape showed that we didn’t win the middle that week. Yes, the Tigers stats also highlights the Eels defence

  4. Longfin Eel

    The 3 scrum wins are interesting, especially when put with the low completion rate. This suggests that the team was looking to attack on each set rather than the usual kick for touch to get a breather. It’s great to see the team playing this way, and it is obviously leading to success.

    1. Sixties

      BA has always encouraged the players to play what’s in front of them, and we saw that in the heads up plays from Gutho to set up fast break tries. The Tigers completed better than the Eels, but the Eels asked more questions in possession

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: