The Cumberland Throw

From The Stands – Round 1 Reflections

The footy is back and even after an all too familiar, absolutely frustrating game from my beloved Eels, I still loved the day and of course my team.

I want to start by apologising to all Parra fans and the players. My lifetime track record at Panthers Stadium is not good, and it could be argued that it’s best that I stay away from this western derby. After Sunday, I am now zero wins from 8 matches at the foot of the mountains! That includes a few where we snatched defeat from the jaws of victory.

Having stayed away from Penrith home games for many years, I was convinced by family that this time would be different and so off I went. Perhaps I should re-visit my self imposed exile from Penrith Stadium….

First, my thoughts on suburban footy.

This match marked the first time that my young son had visited Penrith Stadium on an NRL game day to watch a local suburban derby. He loved the experience, sitting on the hill, and even made friends with a mixture of young Parra and Penrith fans around us. My personal highlight was watching him play a game of touch footy with his new friends out the back behind the hill.

But my nostalgia ends there.

Penrith Stadium

The parking was awful, especially after our 3 hour drive up from the South Coast, the line-up for food and toilets was dreadful and the non-existent reprieve from the excessive heat made for an uncomfortable day.  This is not a criticism of Penrith at all – they put on a great day and being a born and bred Western Sydney girl I wholeheartedly respect the passion and good natured banter that is always shown by Penrith fans.

Simply, our visit to Penrith Park serves to remind me why I am so looking forward to the new Parra stadium. I like going to suburban grounds once, possibly twice a year – just not every week.

On to the game itself. Let’s storyboard it.

Our team was good, then very good, then bad, followed by very bad.

It is only Round 1, but this simple phrase is an apt summary of my thoughts –  ‘the best indicator for future behaviour is past behaviour’.

Let me explain.

Our pattern of play on Sunday was exactly the same as many games last year. Whilst we found a way to victory in tight games last season, against Penrith on Sunday, we could not. 

Pre-game, I had concerns about the Parramatta bench against their Panthers counterparts and my view was simple – we needed to be winning by a lot at the 30minute mark, because that Penrith bench would do some damage.

The best teams have an x factor on the bench. Think Kasiano, Hess, and for the Panthers – Kikau on Sunday. Sure they’ll make mistakes, (even the odd costly one), and they may miss some tackles, but their team will not win the competition without them or a player with similar traits.

Is Kenny Edwards our X factor?

Who was our X factor off the bench?  On Sunday, we didn’t have that player who could come on and change momentum or put the nail in the coffin. Do we have one? Is there a player in the Blue and Gold camp capable of creating fear in opposition players and coaches?

I would argue Kenny Edwards, others might not. But I don’t think anyone would argue against the fact that we need to have one.

When Parra suffers a loss, it is often in a very predictable way. Those 10 minutes before and after half time will be our downfall. We most likely will be in the lead at the 30th minute and be behind at the 50th. Unfortunately this timeframe coincides with the rotation of the starting forwards   to the bench.

It seems to be a familiar scenario. A try in the last 5 minutes before half time – probably a soft try in which simple tackles are missed by players, followed by a drop in intensity after the break. Did our opposition coach know it? Consider his changes (or maybe Gus Gould’s changes) to the starting line-up.

Is there a similarity to NSW origin teams, full of hope, talent and promise? NSW always looks good on paper and selectors will always pick the best 17 players available. Nonetheless, they  continually pick a team with way too many fullbacks and second rowers, because they are our state’s best players and you cannot possibly leave them out. Parra have a group of talented and hard working back rowers who deserve selection. But is this the best option for our team?

It’s  early days in the season, but I wanted to pose a respectful question. Can we win finals football, or even the premiership, with a team and a bench full of hardworking, talented, but tradesmen-like forwards. Do we have the best balance in the forwards in our squad or are we overloaded with back-rowers? Our past behaviour in big games probably answers that in the negative. We need those forwards in our squad, but can we afford to select those same players every week.

It seems simple, yet it could also be very challenging for our coaches to actually deal with. Is it possible to distinguish between players who had an ordinary game but have the capacity to be better in the next game as opposed to players with a pattern of particular errors or who don’t create the right balance in our team? I’m glad that’s BA’s job and not mine.

I know two things.

1. Even though they came up short, our players didn’t lack in effort in the hot conditions.

2. Nothing is achieved by singling out players for a blast. Rugby league is a team sport and great clubs, fans, players and coaches alike win and lose together.

Unquestionably, the boys tried. I guess it’s a pleasing sign of how far our club has come that trying hard is not good enough anymore.

The footy is on again next week and another traditional rival awaits.

Keep the faith Parra fans, this team warrants and deserves our support.

 

In Blue & Gold,

Shelley

If you liked this article, you might consider supporting The Cumberland Throw.

12 thoughts on “From The Stands – Round 1 Reflections

  1. Pou

    Fair argument in general, Shelley, however I would describe both Takairangi and Evans as impactful players off the bench. Unfortunately the nature of the game while they were on the field meant neither got much opportunity with the ball.

    We missed Kenny Edwards though, for sure.

    1. Anonymous

      I think it’s new territory for Taka coming off the bench, Pou, so I’m not sure if we could say he’s an impact player yet. Can he come into the match and inject energy and change momentum? Does he need to work his way into a game? I reckon he can be, but it’s not evident as yet.

  2. Pou

    I don’t think ‘energy’ is the criteria for impact anyway, but rather provision of some attacking ability not otherwise found in the starting side.

  3. Trouser Eel

    Great first write up Shelley.
    I too am glad it’s BA’s job to work this stuff out.

    The way we started in the second half made it look like the Panthers had a cool shower and sat in air conditioning while our boys spent half time running laps.

    1. Pou

      I think the rot started before half time. That Blake try was caused by middle defenders strolling when they should’ve been pushing hard across in cover.

  4. Hearndo

    Great first blog Shelley!
    I think the major blow for us was losing Moses for 25 minutes of the game. If you take a half back out of any team for that amount of time you are going to be up against it. On Sunday I thought we needed his pressure-relieving kicks more than ever to holt the Panthers momentum and allow our middle forwards to recover and get back on top of their ruck control. Kane Evans is copping a bit of criticism for his first game in the blue and gold, but didn’t gutho also struggle in his opening few rounds? Sometimes it takes a bit of time.

  5. Glenn

    Great insightful article Shelley and you’re right, we need an X factor in our team, but I think we’re devoid at this time. We lost our X factor in Semi, probably the greatest winger ever to grace the footy field.

    What we really need is a couple of big skilful boppers, Penrith has them by the truckload and that is what we need. Kikau absolutely smashed us.

    1. Pou

      Kikau smashed us because we let him get one-on-one with a couple of backs. That’s the fault of our middles for not pushing across in cover.

  6. Rocket

    We were not pushing up in defence in the second half. No line speed.
    Penrith forwards were running ten meters from the play the ball the before meeting our defensive line and pushing through.

    Early days we will improve.

  7. AB

    Totally agree about our middle forwards and defence not moving up and across and as stated it allowed there forwards to get one on one.
    Regarding Moses being off and us losing a bit of direction, I think we missed a great opportunity to put Haynes into the halves and Taka into the centre’s. May have provided experience, skill and the X factor that was missing. It may not have changed the result but I think it would have been a better balance to the team.

    1. Rob

      Hayne in the halves and Takairangi unthreatening centres would have changed nothing.

      Our interchange forwards didn’t do their job so we were no chance. Thurston and Cronk or Sterling and Kenny couldn’t have done any better with that lack of platform.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: