The Cumberland Throw

Stat Attack Review – Round 17: Eels defeat Bulldogs

Eels 13 def Bulldogs 12

Crowd: 14,061

It wasn’t a game for the ages, but to defeat the Dogs and grab two points is always sweet – and that’s all that counts.

Once again, the Eels were down to 16 men after a knee injury to Manu Ma’u in the opening 10 minutes forced him from the game. It was a dour affair in the middle with both sides unable to gain any real ascendency.

The Eels went into the sheds with a 12 – 2 lead but as reported in last weeks Stat Attack preview, the Bulldogs had won 5 of their 6 games when behind at the break, so there was an uneasy feel.

But the Eels dug deep, and in the face of some rough calls from the officials and some silly errors, showed that we can win a game against the odds with determined defence and a resilience that harkened back to 2016.

So let’s look at the stats that matter for Parramatta.

 

Score Flow

Parramatta Eels
H Minute Name Event Score
1 4 C.Gutherson PENALTY GOAL 2 – 0
1 16 M.Mbye PENALTY GOAL 2 – 2
1 23 B.French TRY 6 – 2
1 24 C.Gutherson CONVERSION 8 – 2
1 35 S.Radradra TRY 12 – 2
1 36 C.Gutherson CONVERSION MISS 12 – 2
2 49 B.Morris TRY 12 – 6
2 51 M.Mbye CONVERSION MISS 12 – 6
2 69 M.Frawley TRY 12 – 10
2 71 M.Mbye CONVERSION 12 – 12
2 80 M.Moses FIELD GOAL MISS 12 – 12
3 82 M.Moses FIELD GOAL 13 – 12

 

Full Time Stats

 PAR Team Stats  CAN
47 Possession (%)

53

31/37 (84)

Complete/Total Sets (%) 30/38 (79)
36:13 Time – Opposition Half

45:52

11:28

Time – Opposition 20 16:05
2294 Metres Gained

2318

2

Scrum Win 9
0 Goal Line Dropout

0

7

Penalty Conceded 6
0 Forty Twenty

0

 

Both teams completed well, but the Bulldogs dominated in territory and time in possession. The Eels resilient defence, led by Nathan Brown, was the catalyst to the Eels narrow victory.

 

1st Half

 PAR Team Stats  CAN
54 Possession (%)

46

18/21 (86)

Complete/Total Sets (%) 13/17 (76)
16:39 Time – Opposition Half

23:36

8:20

Time – Opposition 20 3:58
1248 Metres Gained

1010

1

Scrum Win 4
0 Goal Line Dropout

0

3

Penalty Conceded 5
0 Forty Twenty

0

 

We witnessed a great completion rate from the Eels in the 1st stanza. Although Canterbury had more time in the Eels half, the Eels had a lot more time in the Dogs red zone and used that to their advantage. Through using their time with the ball a lot more effectively, the Eels made an extra 200+ metres.

Kudos must also be given to the Eels kicking game in this half. Time after time, the Eels finished their sets with kicks deep into the corners. This applied great pressure and resulted in two significant Bulldogs errors, leading to points.

2nd Half

 PAR Team Stats CAN
39 Possession (%)

61

11/14 (79)

Complete/Total Sets (%) 17/21 (81)
18:51 Time – Opposition Half

21:27

2:50

Time – Opposition 20 11:56
961 Metres Gained

1307

1

Scrum Win 5
0 Goal Line Dropout

0

4

Penalty Conceded 0
0 Forty Twenty

0

 

It was a massive swing in the second half to the Bulldogs. It was little wonder considering they had nearly had two thirds of the possession, an extra 7 sets, over half the time with the ball, an extra 340 odd metres and lots not forget not giving away a single solitary penalty.

Still, the Dogs couldn’t jag a win despite enjoying such an advantage. The statistics from the second half make Des’ complaint about the golden point penalty awarded to the Eels look utterly ridiculous. And indeed, it’s obvious that he was looking to shift some blame, albeit to an official that found no fault in the Bulldogs for the previous forty minutes. Des can carry on all he likes, but he seriously needs to look at the 2nd half stats and ask himself why his attacking structures could not take advantage of just on 70% possession in the second half.

 

Golden Point

 PAR Team Stats CAN 
100 Possession (%)

0

2/2 (100)

Complete/Total Sets (%) 0/0 (0)
0:43 Time – Opposition Half

0:49

0:18

Time – Opposition 20 0:11
86 Metres Gained

0

0

Scrum Win 0
0 Goal Line Dropout

0

0

Penalty Conceded 1
0 Forty Twenty

0

 

Pretty self-explanatory. Kick off, hit ups, penalty, kick for touch, hit ups, fieldy, Eels win. Crowd roars. 2 points. Done and dusted. Go You Eels.

 

Attack:

Top 5 Runs
Name R
 PAR N.Brown 25
 CAN W.Hopoate 24
 CAN A.Tolman 19
 PAR C.Gutherson 15
 CAN M.Montoya 15
Top 5 Run Metres
Name RM
 CAN W.Hopoate 322
 PAR N.Brown 206
 PAR C.Gutherson 136
 CAN M.Montoya 134
 CAN A.Tolman 132

 

He’s quickly become a fan favourite, and little wonder! It was an awesome attacking display from Nathan Brown this week. In the toughest part of the field, he tucked the ball under the arm and carried it for a gain of 206 metres.

The Bulldogs run metres are easy to explain. Hopoate was hammered with a great kicking game from both Norman and Moses. Norman and Moses had a combined kick metres of 884. Hopoate’s kick return metres alone were 245m. No doubt a ploy was to kick to Hopoate as the Dogs wingers combined only ran the ball back for 52 metres.

Both teams had 4 players run more than 100 metres, with one player in the 90’s for the Eels.

Nathan Brown 206m
Clint Gutherson 136m
Suaia Matagi 105m
Tepai Moeroa 103m
  • Semi Radradra 93m

 

Run Metres

Eels – 1327m

Bulldogs – 1564m

 

Defence

Top 5 Tackles
Name TAK
 CAN A.Tolman 54
 PAR N.Brown 42
 PAR K.Edwards 42
 PAR T.Moeroa 41
 PAR D.Alvaro 39
Top 5 Missed Tackles
Name MT
 CAN M.Mbye 3
 CAN A.Elliott 3
 PAR C.Norman 3
 PAR D.Alvaro 2
 CAN A.Tolman 2

 

Is it any surprise to see Nathan Brown also feature in defence? This bloke is surely close to the signing of the year, with a team high 42 tackles to go with his 200+ run metres in attack.

A massive accolade goes to Mitch Moses this week. His defence was brilliant. He had Klemmer, Kasiano and Jackson running at him all night and he never took a step back. He dug in and pulled off some fine hits. He missed two tackles but for what it’s worth, those 2 stopped the attacker momentum for others to come in and finish the tackle off. It was an outstanding defensive performance. Well done!

 

Tackles Missed Tackles Ineffective Tackles
Eels 379 20 20
Bulldogs 336 20 10

 

Errors finished at 7 apiece.

 

With Round 17 done and the Eels cemented in 8th spot with a 4 point buffer to the 9th placed Panthers, the Eels will be heading down to Melbourne full of confidence. Knowing we still have a bye in hand can see us move higher up the ladder as we look to our first finals birth since 2009. Facing a depleted Storm outfit without their Origin players, this is a fine time to strike the ladder leaders. But as the ‘Baby’ Storm have shown, they are still a force and we cannot be complacent against them.

 

STAT ATTACK PLAYER OF THE WEEK

 

 

NATHAN BROWN

 

Did you see this coming? It was a no brainer really. Nathan has once again won our weekly award and thoroughly deserves it.

What a massive turn around for him in the months since joining Parra.

If you saw the interview on Fox Sports with Kenny Edwards last week, you were quickly reminded of Brown’s reputation at the Rabbitohs. He was labelled a grub in the media, and many fans and players felt similarly. But Brad Arthur saw what sort of player he was, and could be, and look at how he has evolved!

Browny is being looked at as the buy of the year and should be in the running for Lock of the Year at the major end of season awards.

I would dare say it’s a two-horse race between he and Gutherson to get the 2017 Thornett Medal.

Well done once again Nathan.

 

Possessions 31
Runs 25
Run Metres 206m
Offloads 1
Tackles 42
Missed Tackles 0
Minutes Played 82

Colmac

Stats courtesy of Champion Data. All these stats and more can be viewed on our match centre at http://mc.championdata.com/nrl/ including live game stats.

Champion Data

Follow @championdatanrl

mc.championdata.com/nrl/

If you liked this article, you might consider supporting The Cumberland Throw.

16 thoughts on “Stat Attack Review – Round 17: Eels defeat Bulldogs

  1. Colin Hussey

    Nathan Brown is regularly showing up to be our best signing of the year and not far off best ever, & I have seen some good ones in the past. He is getting similar reviews already as being the signing of the in the NRL overall and certainly deserves it.

    While early I believe he is already worth a contract upgrade, that gives incremental increases over the contract period.

    The other stat that defies the brain snap moments of Kenny, shows why he too is valuable to the team, just needs to control things a lot better and get those snaps out of his game, as he could be an awesome player better than he could dream of.

    Given the way those 2nd half stats show out its really a wonder regarding the defensive resolve of the team how they were able to run out the winners they deservedly won

    1. Mitchy

      True Col. I hope we pay him accordingly and hope he continues on in coming season. He could be capt material with Guth

      1. Colin Hussey

        Mitchy, Not sure if I am right or not, but I get a feeling that Beau Scott may retire at the end of the season, its also not beyond the realms that even Tim may call it a day if his form slump, that I believe is caused by an injury he suffered some games back to his left Shoulder (was it the one he did last year), that is IF it does not come good, would dearly love him to retire and be remembered for the overall work he has performed for the club than go out remembered for his last year of lower play standards.

        Should either happen, I would believe that Brown would be our ideal captain going into the future, he has matured so much and sets such a huge example that it would not hurt for him to be given Scott’s spot officially for the remainder of the year.

      2. Colin Hussey

        Mitchy, its interesting to discuss potential future captains, tend to recollect that Norman was given the ropes, was it last year or the previous one on a few occasions, what disappointed me was that IDG in at least one game came in when Norms wanted to kick for penalty goal, IDG seemed to pull the call away from him and insisted on kicking for the line and go for the try, problem was that he hogged the dummy half and lost the ball mid point of the tackle count. I thought that was a poor effort and Norms should have stood for his decision to take the goal.

        I like the idea of Brown being the captain into the future, and there will be times when he needs a break, the 2 or joint captains idea is one I like, thing is who else? You mention Gutho, and someone else mentions the idea of one being in the spine should be the captain, meaning that brings in Norms and Moses.

        Given that incident with Norms, and its in the past, the big thing is that any one of the 3 could well be ideals for the on field captains role when Brown is off the field. Each of the three are talkers, which is good, and places them at an advantage, with you mentioning Gutho I would certainly think that is an excellent choice as he is very much respected all around, both on and off the field, yet a bit of coin toss though.

        A good situation one would think in having quality players and quality people who can handle the roles.

  2. Mitchy

    Almost 10 min more in our zone; more penalties and time with ball and we still held on. Just a shame we have them a couple of extra chances with intercept and loose carries…we will need all our smarts against Melb and the luck of the refs…theyll have more pressure in the ruck than ever. This game will be tighter than last wk

  3. John Eel

    The 2nd half defence in this game was amazing. I echo Colin’s thoughts on Brown. Dare I say it a little “Sattlerish” in what you are proposing to make the bad boy captain.

    Of the 7 errors committed by the Eels, how many can be attributed to Kenny

    From the Dogs perspective, how good was Tolman.

    1. Colin Hussey

      Tolman really lifted as captain, I honestly believe that it would be the icing on the cake to make Nathan go to another level, if that’s possible.

      1. John Eel

        Tolman is a player who averages big minutes (64) and a lot of tackles (39) each game. On top of that he averages 122 metres per game and has a wealth of experience.

        It helped John Sattler go to another level for South Sydney all of those years ago.

  4. Chris

    Col, I would be interested in kicking metres or any kicking stats.

    The other thing is even with all that ball the dogs could force a line dropout.

    I said on another blog how good our kicking game has been recently. The difference has never been more obvious than that game on Thursday night.

  5. sixties

    Thanks for all the responses thus far.
    On the opinions already offered:
    Future captains – Gutho or Moses are standouts for mine. It’s also advantageous that both are in the spine and have to do plenty of talking anyway. From my observations at training, they both are good talkers and have ownership of aspects of team direction already.
    The defensive performance of the team was outstanding. No doubt we have to be better at getting out of our half when placed under such pressure, but the effort was irrestistable.

    1. John Eel

      Sixties have you seen Willis Meehan around training at all. It has been reported that the NRL has now given him permission to train with the Eels.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: