The Cumberland Throw

Stat Attack Review – Round 4: Eels vs Sharks

Eels 6 defeated by Sharks 20

Crowd: 17,003

 

Well let’s start this write up with one highlight. At least we scored more points than the Bulldogs.

That’s about all I can come up with for this week as again the Eels failed to fire.

Unforced errors once again killed any hope of Parramatta gaining the upper hand in what was a game that really didn’t hit any high standards. Cronulla were just as bad, but they composed themselves well enough at the crucial times to come away with the win.

Let’s look at the stats that matter to Parramatta.

Parramatta Eels
H Minute Name Event Score
1 10 J.Brailey TRY 0 – 4
1 12 J.Maloney CONVERSION 0 – 6
1 29 S.Feki TRY 0 – 10
1 30 J.Maloney CONVERSION 0 – 12
1 40 D.Gower TRY 4 – 12
1 40 C.Gutherson CONVERSION 6 – 12
2 46 J.Maloney PENALTY GOAL 6 – 14
2 55 J.Maloney TRY 6 – 18
2 56 J.Maloney CONVERSION 6 – 20

 

Full Time Stats:

 

 PAR Team Stats  CRO
47 Possession (%)

53

26/42 (62)

Complete/Total Sets (%) 27/40 (67)
40:36 Time – Opposition Half

39:38

11:08

Time – Opposition 20 14:19
2058 Metres Gained

2214

8

Scrum Win 8
1 Goal Line Dropout

1

8

Penalty Conceded 10
0 Forty Twenty

0

 

Looking at the full time stats, you would think that the game was closer than it was. These numbers would indicate that these two teams were pretty even all game. However, once you examine the completion rates for both teams, a true picture of the encounter emerges.

This was not a march for the ages, with errors figuring prominently throughout. With a tally numbering 17 for the Eels and 15 for the Sharks, neither team would be comfortable with their handling. Unfortunately, many of those errors for the Eels occurred in the opposition quarter, so little pressure was exerted on the Sharks defence.

You can’t win a match if you can’t complete your sets.

 

1st Half:

 

 PAR Team Stats  CRO
47 Possession (%)

53

13/21 (62)

Complete/Total Sets (%) 12/19 (63)
27:56 Time – Opposition Half

12:12

6:52

Time – Opposition 20 6:54
1012 Metres Gained

1161

4

Scrum Win 5
1 Goal Line Dropout

0

2

Penalty Conceded 5
0 Forty Twenty

0

 

The first half should have been the platform to victory. The Eels dominated time in opposition half but the promised land of the opposition 20 just couldn’t be reached. This statistic confirms the location of our turnovers. The Eels were perfectly positioned to launch attacks, but instead of working for repeat sets in the quarter, the ball was consistently handed back to the Sharks.

We even had penalties running our way, but again the dropped ball killed any momentum the Eels tried to build.

 

2nd Half:

 

 PAR Team Stats  CRO
47 Possession (%)

53

13/21 (62)

Complete/Total Sets (%) 15/21 (71)

12:40

Time – Opposition Half 27:26
4:16 Time – Opposition 20

7:25

1045

Metres Gained 1053
4 Scrum Win

3

0

Goal Line Dropout 1
6 Penalty Conceded

5

0

Forty Twenty

0

 

The 2nd half reads very poorly for the Eels. The team completely lost their way and everything they tried pretty much turned to mud. The Sharks controlled possession and territory and suffocated Parramatta into submission. That pesky little thing called “unforced errors” was again our 14th man. And didn’t he star – check out his stats!

 

Attack:

 

Top 5 Runs
Name R
 CRO P.Gallen 22
 CRO V.Holmes 18
 CRO A.Fifita 16
 PAR F.Pritchard 14
 PAR B.French 14

 

Top 5 Run Metres
Name RM
 CRO P.Gallen 197
 CRO V.Holmes 176
 CRO A.Fifita 151
 PAR F.Pritchard 139
 CRO S.Feki 129

The effort of the Eels can’t be questioned, but the execution certainly can be. Although they didn’t feature at the top of the statistic, six Eels made over 100 metres and a further five Eels were in the 90’s. It’s not bad numbers, given that the Sharks also had a similar number of players better the 100 metre bench mark. The foundation metres are there but we just can’t capitalise on this. There were tackle breaks happening, but either support runners were missing or poor passes were being thrown.

 

Frank Pritchard 139m
Siosaia Vave 112m
Bevan French 109m
Semi Radradra 108m
Corey Norman 101m
Daniel Alvaro 100m

 

Defence:

 

Top 5 Tackles
Name TAK
 PAR K.Pritchard 41
 PAR N.Brown 38
 PAR D.Alvaro 38
 CRO J.Brailey 36
 CRO M.Prior 33
Top 5 Missed Tackles
Name MT
 PAR K.Pritchard 6
 CRO J.Maloney 5
 CRO R.Leutele 3
 CRO J.Bird 3
 CRO C.Townsend 3

Predictably, the highest tackle counts were notched up by Eels players.

Kaysa again topped the list. He is working very hard in is defence and although he made a game high 6 missed tackles, his defensive rate is second to none.

Ten Eels made 20 or more tackles and a special mention goes out to Siosaia Vave. The big fella made 19 tackles and added 112 running metres in an awesome effort off the bench. He was sure to have received some plaudits from the coaching staff after his first hit out following a long term injury layoff. It was an impressive debut game in the Blue and Gold.

The mounting Eels unforced errors was certainly the primary cause for the increased defensive workload. The extra 36 tackles equates to an addition 6 sets of possession for the Sharks. The only positive from this statistic was a missed tackle rate which was lower than Cronulla. Unfortunately that meant little when it came to the scoreboard.

Eels Tackles: 351 (18 missed tackles)

Sharks Tackles: 315 (23 missed tackles)

 

This game is now history and we have to look ahead to the big road trips over the next few weeks. This week we head to our nations capital to play the Raiders, then off to Auckland to play the Warriors. It’s a big ask for our boys. Whether near or far, lets get behind them.

Sixties sent a tweet yesterday that rang so true ‘A supporter’s strength isn’t found during the good times – it’s evident during adversity.’ This I cannot agree with more. In this day of the fickle fan and band wagoners, a true fan sticks solid. Yes, have your say. But be constructive.

It’s no use blaming refs – we can’t control that. We know they will make mistakes. But we can control the ball better. Complete sets better. Game manage better. That’s in our hands. That’s in our control. Control that and the refs won’t matter in the end.

 

Stat Attack: Player of the Week

 

 

BEVAN FRENCH

 

Bevan just looks dangerous every time he gets the ball.

Whether it’s running a long kick back or bobbing up in the opposition 20, every time he touches the ball you move to the edge of your seat because you know that something is going to happen.

With each game at fullback, Bevan is looking more and more comfortable, and his game watching is increasing game by game. He has a natural instinct for the game and knows where to be on the field during each defensive set. He’s rapidly placing himself in the top fullbacks in the game. His defence, especially one on one, has improved out of sight.

I can’t think of anytime during his stint at fullback from late last year to last Saturday where he has been out of position – unlike a former fullback who even at that time was dreaming.

No use going on about his attack as that is a given. But even this facet of his game has improved as he reads the attack and the opposition defence to know when to inject himself.

Well done Bev.

Possessions 31
Runs (metres) 14 (109m)
Kick Returns 4
Offloads 2
Tackle Breaks 3
Kicks Caught 4 (0 errors)
Minutes Played 80

Colmac


Champion Data

Stats courtesy of Champion Data. All these stats and more can be viewed on our match centre at http://mc.championdata.com/nrl/ including live game stats.

– Colmac

Champion Data

Follow @championdatanrl

mc.championdata.com/nrl/

 

 

If you liked this article, you might consider supporting The Cumberland Throw.

3 thoughts on “Stat Attack Review – Round 4: Eels vs Sharks

  1. Mitchy

    Cheers again Colmac. I also think the 17000 crowd was good. Being a saturday and yes first match, i think this is decent.
    The rest you have mentioned, and suffice to say we do not have to win this week, but it would be nice, and i think the importance is completing at 80% or near, and using the ball in the opp red zone; and just getting to the kick.
    Different opposition and different challenge.

  2. Pou

    Good post mate. Do you guys at Champion Data keep records for forced errors vs unforced? I know the difference is often subjective, but that’s why you get the big bucks.

    1. Colmac

      Yes we do have stats on both forced and unforced errors. I will see what I can come up with over the next few weeks. After Round 6 will try and do a quarter season review.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: