The Cumberland Throw

Stat Attack: Season So Far By the Numbers

Well after 10 rounds and a few questions from our readers at TCT, I would like to post some stats on how we are going so far in this year’s competition against all the other teams.

Hopefully this can draw a picture of how we have shaped ourselves in the first 10 rounds.

 

PARRAMATTA EELS – AFTER ROUND 10 REPORT CARD

 

6 wins (3 at home, 3 away)

4 losses (3 at home, 1 away)

6th on ladder

 

184 points for

141 points against

+43 points differential

 

Used 22 players

 

Key*

Above competition average
Below competition average

 

Match Results

Round Match date Match Score Margin Venue
10 13-May-2016 Eels vs Rabbitohs 20-22 -2 Pirtek Stadium
9 29-Apr-2016 Eels vs Bulldogs 20-12 8 ANZ Stadium
8 23-Apr-2016 Cowboys vs Eels 16-32 -16 1300 Smiles Stadium
7 14-Apr-2016 Sea Eagles vs Eels 22-10 12 Brookvale Oval
6 09-Apr-2016 Eels vs Raiders 36-6 30 Pirtek Stadium
5 03-Apr-2016 Eels vs Panthers 18-20 -2 Pirtek Stadium
4 28-Mar-2016 Wests Tigers vs Eels 8-0 8 ANZ Stadium
3 18-Mar-2016 Bulldogs vs Eels 20-6 14 ANZ Stadium
2 12-Mar-2016 Eels vs Cowboys 20-16 4 Pirtek Stadium
1 03-Mar-2016 Eels vs Broncos 4-17 -13 Pirtek Stadium

 

Parramatta Eels v Competition Average

 Points Scored Tries Goals Points
Parramatta Eels 32 28 184
Comp Average 34.8 31.1 202.1
Comp Max 47 46 281
Comp Min 17 17 102
Eels v Comp Avg -2.75 -3.06 -18.06
 

 

 

Points Conceded Tries Goals Points
Parramatta Eels 24 22 141
Comp Average 34.8 31.1 202.1
Comp Max 62 53 355
Comp Min 19 20 117
Eels v Comp Avg -10.8 -9.1 -61.1

 

Looking at the points scoring stats, the Eels are 18 points off the season average. So we do need to work on our attack a little more. But it’s the points conceded where Parramatta is looking very strong. With the season average of points conceded of 202.1, the Eels have only conceded 141. That’s a massive 61.1 difference to the season average which illustrates that the Eels are winning games on the back of their defensive efforts.

Attack:

Points Scorers

Games Tries Goals Points
Michael Gordon 10 1 27 58
Semi Radradra 10 8 0 32
Michael Jennings 10 6 0 24
Brad Takairangi 10 4 0 16
Clinton Gutherson 10 2 1 10
Kenny Edwards 10 2 0 8
Vai Toutai 2 2 0 8
Junior Paulo 10 2 0 8
Beau Scott 10 1 0 4
Corey Norman 10 1 0 4
Isaac De Gois 8 1 0 4
Kieran Foran 7 1 0 4
Nathan Peats 6 1 0 4

 

Top 10 – Run Metres

Games Hitups/runs Dummy half runs Run metres Kick returns Kick return metres Metres per game
Semi Radradra 10 136 4 1508 18 141 150.8
Clinton Gutherson 10 135 25 1267 33 315 126.7
Michael Gordon 10 132 9 1250 40 438 125.0
Junior Paulo 10 127 0 1156 11 159 115.6
Manu Ma’u 9 123 1 1094 0 0 121.5
Michael Jennings 10 111 15 1041 0 0 104.1
Kenny Edwards 10 101 0 933 3 28 93.3
Danny Wicks 9 100 1 864 13 157 96.0
Peni Terepo 9 93 0 851 10 141 94.6
Brad Takairangi 10 89 2 773 1 12 77.3

 

 

Parramatta Eels v Competition Average

  Runs/Hitups Dummy half runs Run metres Kick return metres
Parramatta Eels 1642 105 15137 1622
Comp Average 1,596.3 114.7 15,438.3 1,811.9
Comp Max 1,699.0 159.0 16,624.7 2,223.8
Comp Min 1,391.0 61.0 13,054.3 1,263.9
Eels v Comp Avg 45.75 -9.69 -301.83 -189.76

 

So looking deeper at our attack, we can see that the Eels are down in most areas against the competition average.

Runs/Hit-ups are well above the season average, but we are below in run metres by just over 300 metres. Even though we are running the ball more than most sides, are we actually not ‘making yards’ with these extra runs? Same goes with Kick Return Metres. Are the opposition getting good kicks away then putting a good kick chase against us and pinning us down in our own red zone? Is this the figures showing why our attack is down 3 converted tries against the season average?

Across ten games, this may not be huge figures to be concerned with. However, given that the team is above average with the number of runs, they do indicate that the team is below the leading teams in the effectiveness of their runs.

 

Top 5 – Try Assists

Games Try assists
Corey Norman 10 9
Brad Takairangi 10 4
Kieran Foran 7 4
Michael Jennings 10 2
Isaac De Gois 8 2

 

Parramatta Eels v Competition Average

  Try assists
Parramatta Eels 28
Comp Average 29.7
Comp Max 41.0
Comp Min 13.0
Eels v Comp Avg -1.69

 

Again with try assists, even though it’s not too bad against the season average, as we are around mid-table in the tries scored category, this stat will reflect how we haven’t crossed the line as often as say the completion rates and runs/hit ups stats have shown throughout the year.

 

Top 5 – Line Breaks

Games Line breaks
Semi Radradra 10 7
Michael Jennings 10 5
Corey Norman 10 4
Michael Gordon 10 3
Clinton Gutherson 10 3

 

 

 

Parramatta Eels v Competition Average

  Line breaks
Parramatta Eels 31
Comp Average 35.1
Comp Max 51.0
Comp Min 16.0
Eels v Comp Avg -4.06

 

Line breaks are pretty good. With a season average of 35.1 and the Eels at 31, if you break it down further it’s a game average of 3.5 across all teams with Parra at 3.1 line breaks per game.

 

Top 5 – Offloads

Games Offload Offloads per game
Junior Paulo 10 22 2.2
Semi Radradra 10 17 1.7
Beau Scott 10 16 1.6
Manu Ma’u 9 14 1.6
Brad Takairangi 10 13 1.3

 

Parramatta Eels v Competition Average

  Offload
Parramatta Eels 122
Comp Average 97.4
Comp Max 152.0
Comp Min 51.0
Eels v Comp Avg 24.56

 

Parra can definitely get an offload away. We are 24.56 offloads above the season average or an extra 2.5 offloads a game better. This demonstrates that the Eels are looking to establish second phase play and aren’t trying to be one dimensional in attack.

 

Kicking:

Parramatta Eels v Competition Average

  Kicks Kick metres
Parramatta Eels 199 6396
Comp Average 188.8 5,939.4
Comp Max 211.0 6,860.0
Comp Min 160.0 5,069.0
Eels v Comp Avg 10.19 456.60

 

 

Kicking has been a great metre gainer for Parramatta primarily through the boot of Corey Norman. The Eels kicking game has seen the Eels gain an extra 456 metres above the comp average.

 

Defence:

 

Top 10 – Tacklers

Games Tackle Tackles/game Missed tackles Tackle Efficiency %
Beau Scott 10 290 29.0 9 96.9
Nathan Peats 6 275 45.8 12 95.6
Tepai Moeroa 9 258 28.7 16 93.8
Manu Ma’u 9 252 28.0 8 96.8
Danny Wicks 9 209 23.2 12 94.3
Junior Paulo 10 203 20.3 10 95.1
Isaac De Gois 8 202 25.3 18 91.1
Peni Terepo 9 187 20.8 5 97.3
Kenny Edwards 10 156 15.6 8 94.9
Corey Norman 10 136 13.6 9 93.4

 

Parramatta Eels v Competition Average

  Tackles Missed tackles
Parramatta Eels 3146 174
Comp Average 3,104.8 214.2
Comp Max 3,347.0 307.0
Comp Min 2,737.0 166.0
Eels v Comp Avg 41.19 -40.19

 

Our defence has been great this year. No doubt led by Beau Scott and Nathan Peats. Even though Parramatta haven’t made as many tackles as per the season average thus far, it’s the missed tackles stat that is very impressive. This is the greatest indicator of the improvement in Parramatta’s defence. The Eels have made 40 less missed tackles against the season average.

 

Great effort boys.

 

Pressure:

Top 7 – Penalties Conceded

Games Penalties conceded Errors Errors per game
Beau Scott 10 8 5 0.5
Manu Ma’u 9 7 8 0.9
Nathan Peats 6 7 1 0.2
Brad Takairangi 10 6 15 1.5
Danny Wicks 9 5 6 0.7
Michael Jennings 10 5 6 0.6
Corey Norman 10 5 5 0.5 

 

Parramatta Eels v Competition Average

  Errors Penalties conceded Goal line dropouts
Parramatta Eels 111 71 16
Comp Average 102.8 74.1 17.1
Comp Max 122.0 89.0 30.0
Comp Min 82.0 52.0 9.0
Eels v Comp Avg 8.25 -3.13 -1.06

 

When building pressure, the Eels need to work on this a bit better. Errors with the ball are killing us at crucial times. We have made 8.25 more errors than the season average. Penalties are pretty good with conceding 3.13 less than season average and also goal line drop outs aren’t bad either. Although building pressure through making the opposition drop out more is another story.

So with these numbers you can pretty much say it’s our errors killing us in games and not penalties as some people would think. So maybe we aren’t that bad off when it comes being on the wrong end of the stick from the officials.

 

 

Discipline:

No doubt this is high on everyone’s stat list. Where and when we have conceded penalties.

 

Parramatta                                                                                                Opposition

 

 

This graphic shows the red area is where Parramatta are conceding a high number of penalties. This isn’t a real shock to most Parra fans though. We know a lot of penalties are given in this area by the Eels. Some even call this a piggy back penalty from the refs. Now remember this is when the Eels concede a penalty.

 

Receiving Penalties (Tackle Count)

 

Tackle Penalties
0 1
1 22
2 19
3 14
4 8
5 3
6 0

 

We are receiving most of our penalties on tackles 1, 2 & 3. This isn’t surprising in itself and most other teams are the same. With a decent kick for touch we can pressure the opposition try line whenever we get a penalty in the middle of a tackle count.

 

Conceding Penalties (Tackle Count)

 

Tackle Penalties
0 3
1 11
2 18
3 14
4 7
5 7
6 0

 

Same for when we concede penalties, most are conceded on tackles 1, 2 & 3. However conceding a combined 14 penalties on tackles 4 & 5 are a real concern. Giving penalties away late in a tackle count is suicidal as no matter where the first set started, having in essence 10 or 11 tackles in a row which includes a kick for touch will result in the opposition attacking in our red zone. So the boys definitely need to tighten their discipline on these tackles.

 

I know a lot of you are big stats followers so I hope you have enjoyed reading this and I have given you an insight into and provided better perspective about how the Eels are going.

 

It is a lot to take in, so if you have any questions or maybe want to learn more then please post your question.

 

And no. I have no influence on these stats as I don’t cover Eels games as I am usually at the game. It is hard capturing your own team’s game. I have covered Eels games previously and is difficult not to get involved in the game.

 

Give me a seat in the stands cheering the boys any day!!

 

  • Colmac

Champion Data

If you liked this article, you might consider supporting The Cumberland Throw.

9 thoughts on “Stat Attack: Season So Far By the Numbers

  1. mitch

    To be clear re the reason why our forwards have such high kick return metres – I’m assuming it’s off the kickoff?

  2. Anonymous

    I really appreciated the graphic showing where we concede the most penalties. It would be great to see it overlaid against each weeks opposition.

  3. Anonymous

    The telling stat was how few return metres Semi had made. Indicative of teams kicking away from him?

    1. John Eel

      True. Gordon and Gutherson 40 and 33 between them, Semi only 18. He has run more than 150 metres per game a massive effort, shows how hard he works. he is also second in offloads with 17. Go back to 2014 and BA would not allow him to pass the ball. His game has really grown under BA in just 2 and a bit seasons.

      1. Craig Bridger

        I agree John, this bloke still young & improving each time he runs out, could be our next Jarryd (without the baggage)

        1. Anonymous

          Without doubt Semi is avoided by the opposition. The power n his runs contribute extra metres. This alone can be seen as a contributing factor in our reduced yardage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: