The Cumberland Throw

The Spotlight – Passion Without Precision But The Signs Are Right

Don’t let that loss hurt. Draw inspiration from it.

That should be the message from the Eels loss to the Broncos.

Players should never be satisfied with a strong performance in defeat. The aim for every match is victory. Parra lost, again, so nobody would be strutting around pleased with what went down.

That said, this was a defeat from which plenty can be taken.

But before looking for the positive, let’s not gloss over some of the continuing problems.

Errors again featured, and the Eels certainly get punished on the scoreboard for most.

The first 15 minutes of the game basically set the game up for the Broncos.

A line-ball offside penalty against the Parramatta kick chase (after Moeroa was held up one play earlier) led to a spectacular individual try to Osako.

A soft head high tackle call was followed up by the Broncos going for the quick tap. Jennings conceded the penalty and found himself in the bin. The next Bronco try soon followed. (The blatant forward pass from Boyd was naturally given the all-clear!)

In both instances, errors from the Eels were spotted by the referees and the tries were scored as a direct consequence.

The third try resulted from clever play from the Broncos. The quick identification of Brad Takairangi not being properly set and balanced in the defence line was rewarded via perfect execution and the pace of Roberts. Classy teams will seize those opportunities and the Broncos were the epitome of class in that moment.

Across the balance of the game, my greatest concern surrounds the mid-field kicking game from the Eels. Every week, mid-field bombs or high kicks directly to the fullback are the norm. Yet I know that this is not part of the game plan. It’s confusing as to why it continues.

I’ve read some criticism of the kick-chase, and there is that saying – “a kick is only as good as its chase.” Whilst acknowledging that there are some occasions when there could be someone competing for the ball, it’s apparent that the team are trying to maintain a straight line in chasing poorly placed kicks. It’s an aspect of Season 2018 that must be improved.

Twice denied Michael Jennings.

It’s also impossible to ignore lost try scoring opportunities. The Eels crossed the line four times for one intercept try. It could be argued that Jennings second dropped ball was literally in the act of scoring. How can this be rectified? It’s arguable that the body position of Eels players is too high as they cross, allowing the opposition to hold the player up or get access to the ball for a strip. This could be a consideration for the coaches. That said, the 50/50 calls don’t seem to go the Eels way with last pass or strip calls.

It may seem like I’ve again identified aspects of the Eels play which point ownership for the loss at the Eels. Any fair minded supporter would not ignore the errors or poor execution which typifies the Eels season. Last night was very much passion without precision.

However, let me be clear. I was fuming about the officiating last night and believe that it was a major factor in the loss. It was reminiscent of the 2017 Finals match against the Storm.

It’s my opinion that not one 50/50 call went against the Broncos. Forward passes, interference on the kick chase, professional fouls that should have resulted in a sin bin, the strip on Jennings – every decision fell their way. It is often said, “that’s footy. It all evens out.” I’m still waiting for the roundabouts to follow the swings in that regard.

Of course, there’s nothing to be gained from focussing on the shortcomings of Ashley Klein and his mates. In my opinion he should not be controlling NRL matches, but as he still gets appointed to a frustratingly large number of Eels fixtures, it’s up to the team to improve their performance.

So to the positive.

In recent weeks, the Eels have lost matches to teams who should have been beaten. In those clashes, Parramatta have played some awful football.

It hurt, but the Eels should draw inspiration from their effort.

Against the Broncos, the effort level from Parra was possibly their best of the year. There were a couple of defensive misses, but all teams will miss tackles. For the great majority of the game the players worked themselves to exhaustion. Nothing was left in the tank.

Parramatta’s much criticised forwards measured up against their much bigger opponents. It’s been the trend from round 7 onwards. The stats confirm the inroads made in attack.

The Eels made 1617 metres to the Broncos 1480. Parramatta matched the Broncos 6 line breaks and their carries resulted in 35 tackle breaks to Brisbane’s 30.

The message to the players can be clear.

That level of commitment had you close, very close, to defeating a talented opposition. Perhaps a different official would have seen a number of crucial calls differently. Perhaps, on another night, Jennings holds onto the ball both times. It may be a case of “what ifs” but this really was one of those matches.

Don’t feel frustrated.

Don’t feel defeated.

Don’t feel miserable.

Feel energised by proving to yourselves, and to your supporters, that you can and will compete with the best.

Commit like that every week and the victories will follow.

 

Eels forever!

Sixties

 

 

Credit for images to NRL and Parramatta Eels

If you liked this article, you might consider supporting The Cumberland Throw.

12 thoughts on “The Spotlight – Passion Without Precision But The Signs Are Right

  1. Milo

    Totally agree with your comments Sixties; errors are killing the team along with some execution. Jennings has carried the ball this way since his junior days; Penrith tried to sort it but could not.I have little else to say about this as its frustrating….. 🙁

    1. sixties Post author

      It’s something different every week. The frustrating part of this was not getting the 50/50 calls, making more errors, and still being well in the contest.

  2. Colin Hussey

    60’s, the last 3 listed items if mixed together makes a wonderful stew.

    I shake my head in disbelief at the game last night. I stayed in front of the box last night until the final hooter, it was both hard to watch but also good and it showed how the eels really can play. Three tries denied by inept refereeing tells but one part of the story.

    The French no try was a linesman call rather the Calvins call, thing was on replay the linesman was behind the play rather than in line. Jennings badly dropped one sitter but the next one was a deliberate hand play of the ball by the donks player, you could see it in not just the replay but in the donks reaction straight away as the ball went loose, but both the ref and bonker was unable to see that.

    While I believe we didn’t deserve to lose, its very much the small plays and misses that we are failing in and falling short at. Simple mistakes such as dropped balls, misreads and the like. But for me, why is it as you point out the same stuff week in and out with the dumb high kicks? The only other types of kicks that are seen are when near the line a grubber is put forward, the opposition know its coming and from who. Too few short kick and chases, and over the head shots to regather are seen.

    It seems to me that we have very poor direction on the field from the area that we need it from. Who really is worse, Norms or Moses?

    We really need to pick it up in the halves and while Gutho needs to be in action more, where is his best spot. Bev seems frustrated out on the wing this year and the thought of him leaving is hard to take.

    To me also I thought the overall work from our two dummy halves was poor, and I believe we are missing the energy and skills of Pritchard, hopefully we will have Brown, Pritchard, and Tim back next week.

    1. sixties Post author

      I don’t have the answer regarding the kicks Colin. It’s confusing.
      The commentators made a few comments about how things don’t fall your way during tough times. We’ve got plenty to blame ourselves for this year. We hardly need calls and the bounce of the ball to go against us too.

      1. Colin Hussey

        I wonder if the answers are on Bob Dyers board.

        Certainly we have done ourselves no end of sorrows, which I think with the 3 games starting with the Panthers helped our season one bit. The sorrow though is that despite the effort like we had last night, the points are not coming our way.

        I want to go to the Knights game, but if Klunk is the referee I’m not wasting money on going and freezing there. I fact I want watch any NRL game that I see him refereeing, how come we have another convict coming to these shores after so many years break?
        Why do us colonials have to put up with that sort of rubbish.?

  3. Parra Pete, Thurgoona

    I can cop a loss when the players have a go..and they did HAVE A GO against the Broncos..The refereeing 50/5o calls went against them and five times over the line for one try!!!!..tells the tale

  4. Shelley

    As long as my team is trying hard both in the game and to improve what needs to be improved within the squad I will always support them. I don’t have to agree with all decisions, game plan etc I simply need to see pride in the Jersey.

    Sure winning is what I ideally want but that does not always happen.
    Rabbitohs, Warriors, Dragons missed the 8 last year- a few selective, smart and calculated changes can turn things around. I just hope my club can stay calm, avoid past errors, ignore the irrational tabloid news who will get every past faction to do an interview and tinker with our squad rather then blow it up. Sacking everyone and starting a new 5 year rebuild every time we hit hard times has not worked in the past 20 years and won’t work now.

    I found last night really hard to watch. The boys look miserable, frustrated and so desperate for a win. It shows they care but because I already knew that it makes it hard to watch the devestated.

  5. Realistic Eel

    Nothing to celebrate here. Since Brad Arthur has been our coach the effort of the players hasn’t been questioned in probably 99% of games. That’s his strength as a coach…his players playing with passion & giving it their all. BUT, once again……the amount of ball we had in the opposition red zone & our attack was clueless, unorganised, at least the forwards threw a few offloads but it makes me sick that two or three times in a set 20m out or less we just we have a forward making a middle field settler. It’s so boring, other teams attack from edge to edge. All our settlers do are allow the defence time to get set. How many set plays do we use apart from the standard dummy inside & block play that every team uses, or our pet set play down the blind that worked a few times in 2016 & 17? Arthur needs to come up with more imaginative plays that catch the opposition by surprise or he needs an assistant coach who can introduce new attacking plays & formations. Have a look at old games from the 80s & 90s, or the Wests Tigers of 2005…..there are so many set plays & variations around the ruck that can be used & would catch out these teams that only train to defend against block plays. How about the inside ball to Val Holmes at Cronulla a few weeks ago that led to a try…..please name me one play where Parra use an inside ball to our fullback in a set structure? The Raiders made this their bread & butter with Brett Mullins. Arthur needs to evolve his coaching strategies or he will slowly be evolving himself out of a job!

    1. Offside

      I believe/hope he has already coached himself out of a job. Our lack of ideas inside the 20 all season have been diabolical

  6. Rowdy

    OK Sixties. I won’t feel miserable. I won’t feel frustrated and I won’t feel defeated any longer than it takes to arrest those thoughts, because it’s generally not in my make up. Unless of course we’re talking about referees? Then I’ll battle the frustration over and over again until we get a few calls go our way or the weekend passes without any impartial support for my chagrin. If Tuesday morning arrives without impartial support? Then I’ll settle for biased, partial parochial support because I know I have to get on with life!

    As for defeated? Can’t argue with the scoreboard.

    Miserable? I don’t recall seeing the boys miserable once they get over the chastisement of video and self analysis. At least it’s not obvious or at least apparent in the field sessions posted on line. The players ability to focus AGAIN on the task at hand cheers me up. Miserable? I don’t see that from my team outside of the sheds immediately after a loss!

    Diplomacy? I could do with a bit more of that too.

  7. Anonymous

    Attitude and execution is poor. Sadly Wenty did not look much better yesterday against the bears.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: